|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Mar 21, 2013 0:50:31 GMT -5
This from the original post for reference: Item 4:
Rookie term assignments.
Option 1:
The current rookie pay scale and term scale remains intact. When a players contract expires while they are on the TS they either become an RFA or a UFA. Currently they are no longer eligible for TS but can be resigned to active rosters.
The change is that those RFA's, after they go through the applicable bidding process, may remain on taxi squad for the length of the new contract.
The issue, I gathered, was the 3rd and 4th round where the term was 2 years. I agree, not enough time to develop players before you need to bump them to active rosters.
Round 5 and 6 would both be "assign term" rounds. Undrafted free agents are all "assign term" players.
Round 1 isn't an issue and round 2 you have three years to figure out the player. With a six round draft and undrafted free agents, quite frankly players staying on your taxi squad for more than 3 years just doesn't happen if they are any good.
Option 2:
The option of two different pay scales. Owners decide whether they apply a lower salary and short term or a longer term but a higher cap number. Owners decide what options works best for each draft pick they have. In each scale rounds 1, 5, and 6 are identical. Also in this option round 5 becomes an "assign term" round along with round 6.
docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?....hBV3BFVHc#gid=0
Option 3:
Both option 1 and 2.
Read more: radl.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=ideas&action=display&thread=773#ixzz2O9OIKvzc
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Mar 21, 2013 0:55:40 GMT -5
To be clear "fallback" simply refers to your 2nd choice should there be a tie between option 1 and 2
So we don't have to vote again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2013 18:52:41 GMT -5
Voted.
|
|
|
Post by The Phantom Menace on Mar 23, 2013 12:32:29 GMT -5
Yeah I voted also. thanks
|
|
|
Post by The Phantom Menace on Mar 27, 2013 13:34:29 GMT -5
So what does that mean? Does 5 votes for both beat 4 vote for RFA only?
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Mar 27, 2013 18:17:59 GMT -5
What does that mean? Good question.
You have to add option 3 and 4 so it is 5 to 4 for both options. They, 3&4, are both the same answer unless 1 and 2 tied for the lead. Then 3 and 4 became specific to the fallback choice.
I apologize that a 4 answer poll is any bit confusing.
Hoping that the format of the poll itself wasn't confusing as to where your votes were going.
|
|
|
Post by The Phantom Menace on Mar 28, 2013 2:37:42 GMT -5
Thanks. I don't think the format was confusing. I was just trying to understand the results. Your explanation make sense. Well at least to me.
|
|