|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 6, 2011 16:35:04 GMT -5
When dropping players under the tax free exemption it occurred to me owners may want to choose to claim the lowered salaried as tax free player.
I think remaining term might dictate this strategy. $25 dollars for 2 years as a cap hit might be less desirable than $40 for 1 year.
Without instructions I will assume the highest salaried guy(s) but owners may instruct the league office specifically.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2011 7:45:48 GMT -5
I'm sure this is clear to everyone else, but what exactly are you talking about?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2011 9:01:09 GMT -5
Yeah, I had to reread it, and then read the rules to finally comprehend. Let's say you drop 4 players today. The commissioner has been automatically applying the tax free exemption to the highest two salaried players since we are only allowed to use the tax exemption on two players. However, the commissioner realized that some folks may want to use the tax exemption on lower salaried players because the number of contract years also plays a factor in which players you decided to drop, and how you want to spread out the penalty, etc.
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 7, 2011 9:31:13 GMT -5
yes, what the pugs said...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2011 10:00:32 GMT -5
Thanks!
|
|