|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 17, 2013 23:40:02 GMT -5
3.8 April 18th - 21st: Top Bid Announcements
a. The bidding account will be accessed and top bids for Franchise and RFA's will be posted. b. Again, only legitimate bids with necessary information will be considered. c. You will receive notification of improper bids after the bidding window has closed. d. The Commissioner may choose to seek clarification on confusing bids if time permits.
3.9 April 22nd - 26th: Right of First Refusal RFA's a. Teams may match offers to their own RFA's b. Matching offers must at least match amount and term of contract. c. Failure to match the highest bid results in the player leaving his current team. d. Teams receive no compensation for lost RFA's e. RFA’s may remain on TS for an additional contract once they are subjected to RFA bidding. f. RFA’s signed away during bidding are not eligible for TS.
3.10 April 22nd - 26th: Right of First Refusal Franchise Players a. Teams may match highest bid for their own Franchise players. b. Matching offers must conform to franchise matching rules. c. Failure to match the highest offer results in the player leaving current team. d. Teams losing Franchise players receive draft picks according to scale. (3.6e)
3.11 April 22nd - 26th: Qualifying RFA's and Tier 2 Tag Offers a. Teams may assign contracts to RFA's currently on their team. b. These are RFA's not bid on in (3.7) c. These offers must include a 10% premium on the player's last contract. d. These offers must be a minimum of 2 years. e. Teams may assign a long term deal to tier 2 franchise tag players not bid on.
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 18, 2013 0:38:32 GMT -5
Franchise Tag Bids:
Jimmy Graham: Cad Bane $57/4, Deadwood $80/4, Ewok $97/4, Parjai $140/4, Alderaan $120/5, Nerf Herders $207/5
Winning Bid: Nerf Herders offer $207/5 and 5th round pick.
Flesh Sabers have until 4-26 to match or decline. MATCH
Rashard Mendenhall: Ewok $66/4 only bid. 6.01 or 6.04 is offered.
Maulers have until 4-26 to match or decline. NO MATCH
Danelle Ellerbe: Ewok $23/4 only bid. 6.01 or 6.04 is offered.
Deadwood has until 4-26 to match or decline NO MATCH
Dennis Pitta: Ewok $31/4 only bid. 6.01 or 6.04 is offered.
Parjai has until 4-26 to match or decline. MATCH, I guess
Jermaine Gresham: Ewok $29/5 only bid. 6.01 or 6.04 is offered.
Yoda has until 4-26 to match or decline. MATCH
RFA bids: No draft picks for RFA
Jerrell Freeman: Maulers $26/5 and Ewok $24/5
Winning bid: Maulers $26/5
Cad Bane has until 4-26 to match or decline. NO MATCH
Justin Tucker: Ewok $5/4 only bid.
Nerf Herders have until 4-26 to match or decline. MATCH
Buster Skrine: Maulers $6/4 only bid
Nerf Herders have until 4-26 to match or decline. NO MATCH
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 18, 2013 0:45:13 GMT -5
I need to look for old language about how to handle it when a team has multiple bids involving the same draft pick(s).
If nothing was ever covered then I need to come up with something that is reasonable and equitable.
|
|
Nerf Herders
Storm Trooper
1%
Who's scruffy looking?
Posts: 688
|
Post by Nerf Herders on Apr 18, 2013 1:22:26 GMT -5
Nerf Herders match bid for Justin Tucker $5/4 having a rookie kicker with the skills of Tucker is a great thing for our team going forward. Steven Gostkowski will take Tucker under his wing in the final years of his contract and help polish Tucker as our future franchise kicker.
Furthermore Nerf Herders have decided to part ways with Buster Skrine. There were some issues in camp when our coaching staff was scolding other players. "Listen up Buster!!" And Skrine would come running. Unwilling to change our coaching slang we have decided to let Buster Skrine join the dark side with Darth Maulers. We wish him luck in his new endeavor (though secretly we hope he takes a blaster to the face) with his new team.
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 18, 2013 1:30:40 GMT -5
Only precedent about draft pick compensation if you owe a 5th and it's not available you offer the next lowest, a 6th. Or 3rd to 4th etc...
Ewok may offer a higher pick if they like for certain player, they have 3 5ths.
Here is what I think if multiple teams decline to match:
Ellerbe = 6.04 Gresham = 6.01 Pitta = 5.07 Mendenhall = 5.04
But 6.01 is Ewok's original pick and the is the pick we start with if only one player is not matched.
Owners may agree on any draft pick they want to.
Beyond that, starting with the lowest bid not matched the worst draft pick in the appropriate round is offered and moving toward better picks as the bids increases.
If all Ewok's bids are unmatched and no other agreements are reached
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 18, 2013 6:40:46 GMT -5
I think whomever has the highest dollar amount should be associated with higher offered pick. Hence the Ellerbe to Mendenhall scale.
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 18, 2013 6:51:03 GMT -5
Deadwood has decided to part ways with Linebacker Danelle Ellerbe. "We simply can't afford to retain him at the numbers we're discussing, we have access ports all over the surface we need to re-engineer and as a result our capital is tied up. We wish Danelle Ellerbe, which sounds like a Jedi or Bounty Hunter, all the best."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2013 22:14:55 GMT -5
Parjai guesses they will match the bid to Dennis Pitta
And I know it's early but will offer RFA Cameron Jordan a $3/3 year deal and the rest of the RFAs can be dropped. Thank you
|
|
|
Post by ewoknroll on Apr 20, 2013 9:01:33 GMT -5
For the picks -- I assumed that it always worked in the favor of the team signing the franchise player, meaning I would give up a 6th rounder next year since I don't have a 7th rounder this year. Maybe I give a 5th rounder and get back a 6th rounder? With that being said, I'm fine giving up my later 5th rounder to make things simple.
I think the point is going to be moot since it's doubtful I will get both Gresheim and Mendenhall.
Nice to have Ellerbe on the team, but I'm bummed that I wasn't the highest bidder for Freeman. I wanted the symmetry of a Freeman leading both sides of my team to glory (.500 season).
And I thought I was going to win the bidding for Graham as well. That $207 bid is going to be a tough one to match.
|
|
Nerf Herders
Storm Trooper
1%
Who's scruffy looking?
Posts: 688
|
Post by Nerf Herders on Apr 20, 2013 13:08:07 GMT -5
For the picks -- And I thought I was going to win the bidding for Graham as well. That $207 bid is going to be a tough one to match. I thought $207 might win by $1 or by $7, but since the inception of this league I've seen people drop half their cap dollars on 1 player. Who knows, I still might loose, but I'll gladly give up a 5th for a TE who is essentially a Calvin Johnson, or Juilo Jones.
|
|
|
Post by RADL Commissioner on Apr 20, 2013 13:23:58 GMT -5
For the picks -- I assumed that it always worked in the favor of the team signing the franchise player, meaning I would give up a 6th rounder next year since I don't have a 7th rounder this year. Maybe I give a 5th rounder and get back a 6th rounder? With that being said, I'm fine giving up my later 5th rounder to make things simple. I think the point is going to be moot since it's doubtful I will get both Gresheim and Mendenhall. Nice to have Ellerbe on the team, but I'm bummed that I wasn't the highest bidder for Freeman. I wanted the symmetry of a Freeman leading both sides of my team to glory (.500 season). And I thought I was going to win the bidding for Graham as well. That $207 bid is going to be a tough one to match. The "ruling" is far from perfect but I needed something quick and relatively fair. Future picks was an option and with 6th rounders it's not too critical, but with higher picks, not knowing exactly what pick you'd get is tough to decide.
|
|
Nerf Herders
Storm Trooper
1%
Who's scruffy looking?
Posts: 688
|
Post by Nerf Herders on Apr 20, 2013 16:55:56 GMT -5
my feeling is if we go with future picks, the team should give 1 round higher. So Say I don't have a 5th this year, so I compensate a 4th next year.
Or a team gives the next lowest pick available. Say I don't have a 5th but my next lowest is 4.8, I give up that instead. So long as someone isn't giving up a 1st or a 2nd instead of a 5th or 6th.
But I'm pretty indifferent on this. Not like any one of us are giving up a 1st or 2nd and if we were I think we'd be prepared for it when we placed our bid. What ever we decide is good. Perhaps in the "off season" we vote on a more standard ruling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2013 17:18:38 GMT -5
my feeling is if we go with future picks, the team should give 1 round higher. So Say I don't have a 5th this year, so I compensate a 4th next year. Or a team gives the next lowest pick available. Say I don't have a 5th but my next lowest is 4.8, I give up that instead. So long as someone isn't giving up a 1st or a 2nd instead of a 5th or 6th. But I'm pretty indifferent on this. Not like any one of us are giving up a 1st or 2nd and if we were I think we'd be prepared for it when we placed our bid. What ever we decide is good. Perhaps in the "off season" we vote on a more standard ruling. I think that if you don't have that pick available in the current years draft than the team losing the Free Agent should be given the choice between the next round up in either the upcoming draft or the following years draft. Meaning if I bid on a player that has a 5th round value which I don't have than the team losing that player can choose a 4th from next year or this year. The other option is that teams can't bid on players that they can't offer the necessary picks for.
|
|
|
Post by ewoknroll on Apr 20, 2013 17:18:48 GMT -5
I thought $207 might win by $1 or by $7, but since the inception of this league I've seen people drop half their cap dollars on 1 player. Who knows, I still might loose, but I'll gladly give up a 5th for a TE who is essentially a Calvin Johnson, or Juilo Jones. Graham will be a stud for you (if you get him). I was just hoping to snag him at roughly $100, which would still make him the highest paid TE in the league at that price. Looks like the market value of a TE is on the rise. But I'm pretty indifferent on this. Not like any one of us are giving up a 1st or 2nd and if we were I think we'd be prepared for it when we placed our bid. What ever we decide is good. Perhaps in the "off season" we vote on a more standard ruling. Agreed -- giving up 5.04 vs. 6.01 isn't going to make a heck of a lot of difference in my situation and I'm fine giving that up. It may be a deciding factor in the Mendenhall owner keeping / getting rid of him, which could be a positive for me. If I had traded away my fifth and fourth rounders and had to give up 3.01, I would be upset. Your idea of next year's pick one round earlier when a pick in given round isn't available makes sense as well. I'd be on board for voting for this idea for 2014.
|
|
cbc
Jawa
Posts: 127
|
Post by cbc on Apr 23, 2013 19:36:39 GMT -5
NOT matching bid for Jerrell Freeman
|
|